Clinton lashes Obama's 'assault' as McCain visits Iraq

Sun, 03/16/2008 - 6:07PM by indielove 3 Comments - 101 Views

by Jitendra Joshi Sun Mar 16, 5:10 PM ET

WASHINGTON (AFP) - Hillary Clinton's White House campaign lashed out Sunday after a report said rival Barack Obama was preparing a "full assault" on her after unloading some embarrassments to his own campaign.

The feuding over the report in the Democrat's hometown newspaper, the Chicago Tribune, came as Republican nominee-elect John McCain polished his national security credentials on a surprise trip to Iraq.

"It is disappointing that a campaign that began by promising a politics of hope has come to this, that it is signalling and revelling in attacks on Senator Clinton's character," her communications director Howard Wolfson said.

"This is not the campaign they promised us," he said on a conference call.

The Tribune noted that Obama was now distancing himself from his fiery Chicago pastor, who argues in a newly unearthed video that the September 11 attacks of 2001 showed that "America's chickens are coming home to roost."

The Illinois senator had also sat down Friday for a grilling from Chicago reporters about his past ties to a city property developer, Antoin "Tony" Rezko, who is on trial for corruption in public contracts.

The Tribune report said Obama was "trying to air his dirty laundry ... as he prepares a full assault on Senator Hillary Clinton over ethics and transparency." It did not spell out what form that assault might take.

But earlier Sunday, Obama aides kept up a barrage of questioning over Clinton's tax returns, her records from her White House days, and possible ties to donors who gave generously to her husband Bill's presidential library.

"The Clinton campaign says she has been fully vetted but the truth is she is a veteran of non-disclosure," Obama chief strategist David Axelrod said.

"All of this has created a sense that there are things she wants the public not to know," he said.

And addressing the Clinton camp's battle to seat delegates from the pariah states of Florida and Michigan, Axelrod said: "You get the feeling they are literally trying to do anything to win this nomination."

The feistier tone between the campaigns belied a truce over Obama's pastor with Clinton supporters passing up repeating opportunities to decry the inflammatory language of Reverend Jeremiah Wright, who said in the newly disclosed video that the 9/11 attacks were brought on by US "terrorism."

House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi, the country's highest ranking elected Democrat, ruled out a "dream ticket" combining Obama and Clinton and said the party's nominee should be whoever leads in the final delegate count.

That would appear to favor Obama, while The New York Times reported that many Democratic "superdelegates" are loath for party grandees to overturn the will of the majority of voters at the August convention in Denver.

In the race for pledged delegates, Obama enjoys a lead of about 170 over Clinton. He has won double the number of states and is ahead in the national popular vote.

Speaking on ABC News, Pelosi said "if the votes of the superdelegates overturn what happened in the elections, it would be harmful to the Democratic Party."

"This is going to be over before we go to the convention... pretty soon, somebody will be far enough in front that this will come to an end," she said.

The next battle in the Democrats' nominating epic is Pennsylvania on April 22. But Obama is already campaigning in Indiana, which votes on May 6 along with North Carolina, in a sign that the race has weeks to go yet.

Clinton, dogged by her 2002 vote authorizing military force in Iraq, was due to give what her campaign called a "major policy address" on the war on Monday in Washington. The US-led invasion's fifth anniversary looms Thursday.

While the Democrats are sparring furiously over who would be the better commander-in-chief, McCain and two other pro-war senators arrived in Iraq on the first leg of a tour also taking him to the Middle East and Europe.

On CNN, Democratic Senator Patrick Leahy accused McCain of heading over for a taxpayer-funded "photo op" instead of asking "hard questions" of the Iraqi government.


1

I just do not see how the Democratic Party can survive this internecine war. It does not look like anything will be settled before the convention, by then the Clinton attack machine will either have secured the nomination, or not. Either way they will have done everything possible to make Obama unelectable. Meantime John McCaine will getting a free ride.

Mon, 03/17/2008 - 12:00am

2

"Either way they will have done everything possible to make Obama unelectable."

Guess it's a case of 'If I can't have you, no one can."

Mon, 03/17/2008 - 12:55am

3

You know what really disappoints me about this campaign so far? The Clinton camp, led by those icons of the modern Democratic Party, have shown themselves to be fully willing and capable of using the politics of divisiveness, fear, race-baiting, and xenophobia to win this election. They will absolutely tear the party apart just to win.

Obama has made no unwarranted attacks on Clinton--in fact, his campaign has been extremely kid-glove towards her, as far as I can tell. All the questions he has raised have been perfectly legitimate and appropriate. Even though there are plenty more hard attacks that could justifiably be made against her character and her actions as a politician and a candidate.

Meanwhile, the Clinton side uses surrogates to do their dirty work. There appears to be nothing attackable in Obama's past or present that is of any substance--perhaps because he has been truly open and honest--so their surrogates and campaign workers have to resort to the dirtiest and most disgusting of attacks against him. The nicest thing they've done is to try to discredit him using the empty and baseless accusation of his "inexperience," and as for dirty tricks--well, I think circulating emails that say he's a Muslim, took the oath of office on a Koran, etc. is definitely a dirty trick. It plays on American xenophobia and racism, as well as having been completely false.

And the Clinton camp really wants to get a fight started on who's campaigning dirty?

(Sorry this came out so incoherent; this really makes me mad.)

On a side note, has anyone read Rolling Stone's article about the self-destruction of the Clinton campaign? It's quite a good read.

Mon, 03/17/2008 - 11:35am


Post A Comment

To post comments, please log in or register.

About Me